Unihertz Jelly 2E vs Yezz Art 3 Pro Comparison

Compare Specification and Price of Unihertz Jelly 2E and Yezz Art 3 Pro

Selected Mobiles

Unihertz Jelly 2E
Unihertz Jelly 2E

Brand:

Model:

Yezz Art 3 Pro
Yezz Art 3 Pro

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Price $159.99 $169.00
Pros and Cons
Pros -- --
Cons -- --


Overview
Class Smartphone Smartphone
Status Available Available
SIM Type Dual Nano SIM Card Dual SIM
Network Band : GSM (Band 2/3/5/8), WCDMA (Band 1/2/4/5/8), LTE-FDD (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/25/26), LTE-TDD (Band 34/38/39/40/41)
NFC : No
GPS : GPS + GLONASS + BeiDou + Galileo
2G GSM: 850/900/1800/1900
3G: 850/900/1900/2100
4G LTE: B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B12/B17/B28AB
Operating System Android 12 Android 12
Processor A20 MT6761D Quad-Core 1.8GHz Mediatek
In The Box Jelly 2E User Guide Warranty Card Phone Lanyard Type-C cable Transparent Protective cover SIM Eject Pin Screen Protector --
Physical Dimensions
Dimension (HxWxD) 95 x 49.4 x 16.5 mm --
Weight 110 g -- g
Display
Size 3.0 inch 6.5 Inch
Technology -- IPS
Resolution 480 × 854 pixels --
Other Features Cover Glass : Corning Gorilla Glass FHD+ LCD
Memory and Storage
Internal Memory 64 128/256GB
External Memory -- 32GB
RAM 4GB 6GB
Battery
Type Non-Removable 2000mAh Battery 5000 mAh
Camera
Primary Camera(Rear) 16MP AF 8MP(Wide Angle)+ 48MP(Main) Depth Sensor
Secondary Camera(Front) 8MP FF 16MP
Data & Connectivity
GPRS -- --
Bluetooth Bluetooth 2.1+EDR, Bluetooth 3.0+HS, Bluetooth 4.1 --
USB Type C --
Wi-Fi WLAN 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac 2.4GHz/5GHz, Wi-Fi Direct, WI-FI Display, Wi-Fi Hotspot(V2.0) --
Multimedia
Music Player -- --
Messaging
SMS -- --
Features
Java -- --
Sensors Fingerprint
G-Sensor
Gyroscope
Proximity
Ambient Light Sensor
Compass
--
Additional Features Fingerprint : Yes
Facial Recognition : Yes
Infrared Port : Yes
USB : USB Type C
USB OTG: No
Programmable Key : Yes
Loudspeaker : Yes
3.5mm Headphone Jack : Yes
Wireless Charging : No
FM Radio : Yes
--
Colors Available
Colors Silver Space Black, Snow White


Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9772